Second of the three Amanita Design games I played, and my least favorite. It deviates from their formula the most. It's got the interactivity and the simplicity, but it's lacking in the puzzle department. It seems like they were playing around with the card game trend, and they incorporated items that you can use (as in a point-and-click) as cards that you pick to interact with characters and other game objects.
So, in Pilgrims, you are a pilgrim (of course...). You have a 2d map to traverse with various points of interest. Some of these will have other characters who want things, and others will be more interactable sites, like a campfire you can cook on (drop a fish card on the fire and you get a cooked fish card, etc.). I thought that I would have to use my brain more to decipher how to meet the various characters' desires, but it's not meant to be a puzzle game. It's meant to be playful. You try using all the cards on all the things with all the pilgrims and see what happens.
As you meet people's needs, they will join you too, so you might have three or four different characters with you at any given time. Ultimately, you'll fulfill each of their requests in order to move forward with your main pilgrim. You don't necessarily know what will fulfill their requests, and I guess it's puzzly in the sense that you need to figure it out, but just clicking on everything will get a hit. And it is cool that there are multiple ways to achieve various goals. For example, you need to get rid of a bear in a cave so you can enter and get something from there. The old lady can thwack it with a broom, you can give it flowers that make it go to sleep, you can poison it with a mushroom, and so on. The game wants you to replay it and find all the interactions (there are achievements for each of them), though the story doesn't change.
Pilgrims was neat, but really short and simple, and not as funny or engaging or weird as most of Amanita Design's other games.
add a comment  - read this GameLog  |
I played three Amanita Design games: Chuchel, Pilgrims, and Happy Game, in order of their release. This was after recently playing Creaks, an excellent puzzle game of theirs.
So, Chuchel first. It's described as a "comedy adventure game," and I thought it was pretty funny. It's trademark Amanita Design quirky art and sound. It's playful as well. You are Chuchel (at least I assume that's the character's name), a little ball of fuzz with a hat who wants a cherry. Some other creature is taunting Chuchel, keeping the cherry just out of reach. Another character, a little bug, also wants the cherry, and accompanies Chuchel, sometimes helping and sometimes hindering his efforts.
The entirety of the game is moving from scene to scene solving little interactable puzzles trying to get the cherry. There are dozens of other weird characters that act in all sorts of silly ways depending on what you do to them (talk to them, yell at them, use other objects on them, etc.). There's not a whole lot to say. If you like Amanita Design games and want a silly couple hours with a very angry and cute fuzzball, you can't go wrong. This was my second favorite of the three.
add a comment - read this GameLog |
Slew of entries coming in...After I finished the PS Plus stuff, I looked into how Game Pass counts a month, and turns out they do it on the same day the following month, regardless of how many days are in a month (signing up in February short-changes you!). So I waited until July 5, since I have had things to do the past few days, and when I have almost all of the next three days to binge stuff, so it will last until August 5, which is a Monday and gives me a full final weekend before I transition into a crazy fall semester. Play while I can, right?
Anyway, this week I knocked out some short Steam games while waiting. Blind Drive was first. Never played anything quite like it. You steer a car blindfolded. Rather, you are MADE to steer a car blindfolded. It reminded me of the things I did as an undergraduate for psychology experiments and other weird things I found in Craigslist ads to make money. The story is bananas and revolves around your grandmother, some gangsters, and ice cream.
The UI is super minimalistic because you do not need your eyes to play this game. Since you are driving into oncoming traffic, other motorists honk and yell at you. You hear them approaching on either the left or right side and you use LT and RT to steer to the opposite side to avoid getting hit. Unless you hear the ding of a bicycle bell, in which case you should swerve to hit it and get an extra life because this game is unhinged. On the more difficult parts, such as the segments where you are being shot at and have to dodge bullets (and other cars, and farm animals, depending on the segment), I actually closed my eyes to focus, which helped. Toward the end, my nerves were on edge and I set the difficulty down to easy and finished it that way. Sometimes the cars come so dang fast! Your reaction has to be immediate, and you always have to hold LT or RT a little bit until the car passes you. So, you hear the car approaching, immediately get out of the way, hold a sec until it passes, then release. Sometimes another car will immediately come, sometimes from the other side, and so you are trying to listen and react as fast as possible.
You get three "hearts," which means you can be hit three times before "dying." You continue whatever segment you are in, unless it's a more scripted one like one of the "boss fights." So in a normal segment, you'll progress whether or not you are dying, but you'll have to get the boss fights right to beat those.
Playing Blind Drive is like doing a hearing test for two hours. I would never think to make a game of it. Definitely worth playing for the novelty!
add a comment - read this GameLog |
Really polished game that's a seamless blend of arcade-style spaceship games and 2d sidescrolling shoot-em-ups. Velocity 2x's movement is ridiculously smooth (and so appreciated after playing floaty FAR: Changing Tides!) and you have tight control over it; they clearly spent a long time getting it just right. The game unfolds over 50 levels, and during its runtime trickles new abilities, upgrades, and adds much depth to the basic mechanics that allow for ever more complex and impressive level design.
The main trick it pulls is, as I alluded, seamlessly switching between having you control the main character's ship and Kai herself. You begin each level in the ship, flying "up" the screen in typical 2d space shooter style. You can shoot straight ahead, throw bombs in the cardinal directions, teleport in any direction, and speed up. You'll use these skills to navigate the level, kill enemies, collect researchers (pick-ups breadcrumbed throughout the flying parts), and blow up numbered keys. You'll occasionally approach doors where you can dock and get off on foot, where you run-and-gun your way through, collecting crystals (pick-ups breadcrumbed throughout the on-foot parts), killing enemies, avoiding/shooting/teleporting through obstacles, and blowing up more numbered keys.
The numbered keys are the key (ha) to the levels' complexity. Keys are both numbered and color-coded such that, for example, in earlier levels, you might have a blue 1, 2, and 3. You have to shoot them in order, with blue 1 making blue 2 available to shoot, and so on. In later levels, you will have tons of keys, for example blue 1-9, orange 1-9, red 1-8, and purple 1-7. The game eventually introduces long-range teleporters, which let you essentially drop beacons that you can instantly teleport back to from the map. The screen flashes blue and makes an indicator noise at junctures where you should place long-range teleporters, for example, at a juncture where you can go right or left (drop teleporter, go left to the end, warp back, then go right). Earlier levels are linear, but the later ones become labyrinthine, with out-of-order keys all over the place, including in the on-foot parts. For example, you fly, shoot blue 1 at a juncture, drop a teleporter, go left, shoot blue 2, enter dock A (the on-foot parts are lettered), shoot blue 3 and purple 1 in there, come out, shoot purple 2, teleport back, go straight, shoot red 1, enter dock B, shoot red 2 and blue 4, come out, teleport back, go right, enter dock C, shoot red 3, come out, teleport back, go left again, enter dock A again, shoot red 4 and blue 5, come out, etc. etc. It's even way more complicated than that because color-coded locks will "wall off" certain areas that only become navigable once you blow up that lock. So, shooting that blue 5 might open up a new path. You'll have several long-range teleporters laid down at once and will be traversing back and forth around the map, which conveniently indicates which locks are shootable, to move forward. Once I realized that these levels were becoming puzzles, I was like, "Now THIS is cool."
It's obvious I was into this. BUT, about 2/3 of the way through, I realized that the game did me dirty! You see, on each level, you earn a score based on (a) how long it takes to complete; (b) how many researchers you rescue; (c) how many crystals you collect; and (d) how many points you earn, which seems to be some reflection of the first three. Meeting thresholds on any measure nets you experience points (for example, beat it in 1 minute, you get 60 points, in 2 minutes you get 40 points, and in 3 minutes you get 20 points). This is cool. It allows you to strive for mastery. BUT, each subsequent level is locked behind experience point pre-requisites; you must have xxxx experience points to unlock each level. This means that you have to attain some level of mastery on previous levels. I didn't realize this until about 2/3 of the way through. Until then, I had been operating under the assumption that doing pretty good on all measures each level was good enough (I even got an achievement for being above average on all levels up to a point!). But it was level 38 or 39 or so when I didn't have enough experience to unlock it. What to do? Well, I went back to level 1 and started aiming to beat levels faster and get all the researchers and crystals that I'd previously missed. Usually, I was scraping 20-40 extra experience points from each level. Had I known that this level gatekeeping would be a problem, I would have gone a little slower through each level in the first place and picked up all the researchers and crystals. Did I not know this because I don't play many games in this genre? Is this a relic from it being 10 years old? Did other players hit this wall earlier or later than me? Were they similarly annoyed?
I replayed about half the levels, and unlocked a few more with my hard-scraped experience points, before deciding that it wasn't worth my time. I think I am at level 42 or 43. I calculated how much more experience I need to get all the way to level 50, and how much time it would take to get it all, and I would need to continue replaying at least 8 more levels (which would bring me into the 30s), and doing exceedingly well on the increasingly difficult unexplored ones in the 40s. Basically, I would be replaying the entire game. I am really annoyed that the game wasn't explicit in telling me that I need to focus on collecting all researchers, crystals, and going fast to maximize experience because later levels are gatekept! In fact, there are three "types" of levels, and one is a speed level, where you are supposed to go as fast as possible. I understood that if you miss a few crystals, it's okay. But no, you need every bit of experience to move forward. It's grindy.
Even though I am not going to finish, I still really like Velocity 2x. The only negative thing is regarding the level gatekeeping; everything else is impressive, especially the maze-like level design with all the colored and numbered locks and the excellent movement. It's older, and I had to buy a physical copy because it's not on the PS Store, but was worth getting my hands on.
add a comment - read this GameLog |
