 |
|
Nov 2nd, 2008 at 21:00:50 - Super Columbine Massacre RPG (PC) |
Running away isn’t an option (or if it is, I didn’t find it), which I suppose is true to the situation. It’s unlikely that either of these boys would run away from anything at this point. They were on a mission to kill people and no one was going to stop them. They had this obsession with hatred and ending the lives of as many people as possible with the fervency of religion. What they did was moral to them and they obviously felt they had to do it.
They mention at one point something about changing the gun laws. Almost like a dare to the government to try and change the laws or…I wasn’t exactly sure what they meant but I think that if gun laws were tighter, they still would have gotten their hands on weapons and they still would have shot up the school. The collectable items were more symbolic than anything. The CD, the book, and the game all point to media as a possible influence. If someone were to immerse themselves completely in that lifestyle of death and killing I imagine it would take a toll on your mind eventually. I wondered during the shooting if they had taken any sort of drugs beforehand, just to dull themselves to what they were about to do.
I found myself trying to avoid people in the halls so that I wouldn’t have to kill them. I just wanted the experience to end as fast as possible. Ultimately I wouldn’t recommend this game to anyone and I wouldn’t ever play it again.
This entry has been edited 1 time. It was last edited on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 21:01:10.
add a comment  - read this GameLog  |
|
Nov 2nd, 2008 at 20:48:29 - Super Columbine Massacre RPG (PC) |
When I sat down to play a second time and actually got into the school, I was surprised to see that the fighting style is turn-based. This seemed to really make the game feel like a game. At that point I shifted into my gamer mode and it became me shooting pixel people. I lost a lot of the earlier sense and bad feelings that I was out to kill students and it became business as usual—shoot the enemies….though the ‘enemies’ in this case weren’t attacking me.
The Frankenstein scene seemed out of place, but I don’t know much about the facts concerning these two troubled students. I’m assuming they had some sort of project involving Frankenstein at some point.
There was a part where you can enter a bathroom and it appears that someone is getting beaten up by a group of students. The creator’s choice to add this seemed strange. My first thought was to fight the jocks beating up the student, but then I wondered what the point would be. I would only succeed in suffering some damage (that I could heal easily) and ‘rescuing’ the bully victim. This made no sense because I was already going around shooting at random and killing people; the sudden option for redemption, however slight, made me wonder what sort of message that creator was trying to send.
Was s/he trying to glorify or denounce the Columbine shootings? The montage of pictures at the end made me think this was a tribute to the shooters, though I’m not sure if it was meant as positive or negative. Obviously some thought went into this game, I just don’t know if it should have. I don’t understand why this exists.
add a comment - read this GameLog |
|
Nov 2nd, 2008 at 16:40:53 - Super Columbine Massacre RPG (PC) |
As soon as I heard about the new gamelog and that we had to play a game that detailed the events that took place at Columbine High School in 1999, I was prepared to be disturbed. I assumed prior to playing that this would be your standard shoot ‘em up, how-much-blood-and-gore-can-we-show style game skinned with students and a high school. The fact that the game actually shows backstory, ie-Dylan and Eric planning their attack and discussing it, made the whole experience more poignant and surreal. Players are forced to see that these teenagers were ‘real’ people and not just pixilated tools created to wield a weapon. The game makes this event less of a news story puts it in more human terms.
In terms of ethical decisions, I think any sane person would agree that what Dylan and Eric did was, to put it bluntly, unethical and wrong. Shooting up a school can’t be deemed right by any theory we’ve talked about. Utilitarianism doesn’t work because far far more people were made unhappy by the outcome. Kantianism can’t justify what they did—shooting people at random is not a universal law. Social contract theory that basically says if it’s moral for me to act one way, then it’s alright for everyone else to do so also—definitely not alright in this case.
An incident of this magnitude that affected so many people’s lives and continues to affect people’s lives can’t be explained in one theory. I think just as humans at our core we know some things are wrong and bad and that’s enough of a reason to justify doing or not doing an action.
This entry has been edited 1 time. It was last edited on Nov 2nd, 2008 at 16:41:44.
add a comment - read this GameLog |
|
Oct 5th, 2008 at 17:11:29 - Grand Theft Auto - San Andreas (PS2) |
Despite my rant on gameplay in the last entry, I’m only one person and the majority of the gaming world obviously doesn’t feel the way I do on the less than great gameplay layout. Taking a look at the ethical choices one has to make: should I or should I not steal this car?, If I kill this person, I’ll get respect points but I’ll also run the risk of getting killed by his gang—what to do? The list goes on. The game leaves no other option for you that is plausible besides violence. I mean, sure I could walk to my next mission and burn out all my stamina, but why do that when there’s plenty of hijackable cars being driven down the road? I could outrun the police and hide until they leave me alone, but then what would be the use of this pistol I’m carrying? GTA forces the player into a mindset to cater to our inner criminal mafia personality.
Within ten minutes of gameplay I found myself absorbed in the story and having to think like a criminal to get what I wanted. In the real world I’d never hijack a car, and when I sat down to play the game it didn’t occur to me at first to do so. I was given a mission and a map and that was all. I half-expected to be given another bike and as I/Carl started walking I noticed all the cars flying past me. “Hey, this is GTA, what am I walking for?” I thought. I stood next to the nearest driver door, engaged in a brief bout of button mashing and I was soon the new owner of a stolen vehicle.
I’ve heard the occasional news story of someone killing another in real life claiming the crime was inspired by GTA, and I don’t doubt it. This is the kind of game that gives video games a bad name. Parents and politicians are in arms over games like this, where the main reason to play is to kill and commit crime and do drugs, etc. I don’t blame them, I wouldn’t want my ten or fourteen year old playing this. I felt more annoyed and violent only after playing for an hour. Even if I didn’t notice the effects of the violence immediately, I think those images and feelings would stay with me whether I realized it or not and possibly manifest themselves in other ways. I don’t think that these types of GTA/M-rated games should be made illegal, but I also thing the access to the public should be really limited. By that I mean there should be tighter laws that would prevent kids from getting GTA; ‘should’ being the operative word—the chances of tougher laws realistically being put into effect are small. Ultimately I think the responsibility lies with the concerned parents to be techno-savvy and learn to monitor what their children play.
read comments (1)  - add a comment - read this GameLog |
|
|
 |
| Hazmat24's GameLogs |
|
Hazmat24 has been with GameLog for 15 years, 6 months, and 21 days |
view feed xml
|
| Entries written to date: 6 |
|
