Please sign in or sign up!
Login:
Pass:  
  • Forget your password?
  • Want to sign up?
  •       ...blogs for gamers

    Find a GameLog
    ... by game ... by platform
     
    advanced search  advanced search ]
    HOME GAMES LOGS MEMBERS     ABOUT HELP
     
    EX's GameLog for Mario Kart: Double Dash!! (GC)

    Friday 12 January, 2007

    I've been playing Mario Kart: Double Dash on and off since last quarter on one of my apartment-mate's Gamecube, typically competetively, so I decided to pick it back up and play some more to analyze it more in-depth.

    As far as racing games go, the graphics are good, and well adjusted to the comic Nintendo style of 3D adaptation of old NES game characters, nicely setting the tone/mood of the game as light and fun, yet competitive, and the innovative features add some interesting twists to the gameplay experience--namely the co-op play (hence the title name). While an interesting idea to play with, the co-op play is very chaotic and challenging; while items can be employed more effectively/strategically (ex: it's kind of hard, although not impossible, to take out homing shells/eggs following you while driving), you can't really directly control your partner's action directly, placing you at a disadvantage at the same time (i.e. you can't immediately activate a mushroom/boost right whe you need it). Never-the-less, it was rather fun and interesting to play with.

    The variable speed (difficulty?) modes 50,100, and 150cc and then mirror (150cc but everything mirrored left-right) presented a challenge, allowing for a relaxed learning curve for new and casual players while also offering a challenge for more experience/skilled players. As of now, I can take the gold 90% of the time in 100cc, but 150cc and mirror is still rather difficult... only 50-60% of the time do I manage to finish in the top 3 when playing agsint the computer.

    Along the lines of multi-player play, I had a lot of fun racing against my apartment mates and with the battle-mode mini-games, especially Bob-omb Blast in which we would hoard bombs and then go on bombing sprees against each other. I was rather disappointed however that there are only 4 maps available for the battle-mode games, since each round feels so short to play.

    On to the mechanics of game-play... The car (or car-like thing... o_0') selection is fairly typical of racing games, although in multi-player races, I was disappointed that it does not show the vehicle statistics during vehicle selection (it only displays them for single-player games) which was a drag since most of my apartment mates play the game as a social activity, not bothering to play or practice in single-player.

    While experimenting with different vehicles, which had the typical range from light-weight (high acceleration but low top-speed) to heavy-weight (high top-speed and low acceleration), I found that certain car types performed significantly better or worse on certain courses (ie. the light-weight go-cart was very effective on more technical courses such as Bowser's Castle and Wario Colloseum and relatively poorly on courses with long straight-ways such as Waluigi Stadium and Mario Circuit. Of course, this isn't unexpected, but the results change entirely when racing in Grand-prix mode (Computer fills empty slots so a total of 8 racers are on the track). While the light-weight cars could excel in cornering, I found that it was only easy to win with light-weight vehicles if I stayed in front and key a massive lead the entire way--the high acceleration enabled fast recovery from any shells etc. coming from behind; however, the trick was trying to get past the mass of opponents, because the low weight of the car made it easily get knocked around, and once knocked back, it was difficult to gain ground with the low top-speed . On the extreme opposite, heavy-weight cars could easily knock-away other cars, but when hit repeatedly by a flurry of shells etc. (as I love to do with the Paratroopa/Koopa triple homing shell special) is rendered as pretty-much out of the race because the acceleration speed makes recovery extremely difficult; thus, unless you're either very lucky or have awesome countering skills, keeping first place, especially on technical courses is downright hard, if not impossible at the 150cc. In this regard, I think the game balance is a bit off, particularly since power-sliding, which is vital for skilled players, allows retention of vehicle speed while turning, rendering the light-weight car's acceleration rate practically useless so-long as the heavy-weight car doesn't spin out. However, when I compared the regular cars to special unlockable cars such as the Parad Kart, I found there to be little reason to go back because the over-powered stats made it an obvious choice as being all-around superior and having a better chance at winning, seeing that luck tends to play in as a big factor in addition to skill. (ex: on some races, I got nothing but bananas when I really needed something--anything really--other than bananas... while on other races I got just the right items that I needed to pull off an incredible last-minute win)

    All-in-all, I'd say as far as racing games go, Mario Kart: Double Dash is a bit more intriguing than say a more realistic simulation-based racing game such as the Test Drive series because of the features it offers, but lacks the depth of game-world sophistication of a back-story or storyline--but then again that's probably just the genre or my narrow opinion of it. I wouldn't really see much point in playing much more single-player beyond unlocking all of the unlockables or practicing so I can beat my friends in multiplayer because the game structure provides little more enjoyment (in my opinion) other than those two aspects. I will probably continue to pick it up and play it occasionally in the future, but not very often, seeing how there are many more interesting games out there.

    Comments
    1

    This is all my personal opinions, but between Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo: I've always thought as Nintendo being the gameplay experts...which sort of makes sense for a company thats been making games in one way or another since the late 1800's, Sony as the media experts...which sort of corrolates to their investments in the movie business, and Microsoft as sort of the big loud blingy experts...which sort of makes sense given...well, America.

    Nintendo in particular has always put gameplay way before media...the prime example being that the N64 only had 4 megs of texture memory...compared to the contemporary computers which sported 8-16 that.

    As a side-effect Nintendo artists have always had an amazing ability to get all the bang for their meg which I tend to assume led to the often cartoony, non high-def texture style of many Nintendo games...which in turn has a large effect on their feel. They often tend to be more fun but less memorable.

    But thats all just my thoughts...don't quote me on it.

    Monday 15 January, 2007 by Jade
    write a comment      back to log
     
    NEED SOMETHING HERE
    blablabla
    blablabla

     home

    games - logs - members - about - help - recent updates

    Copyright 2004-2014